Method Comparison (Agreement) Studies: Myths and Rationale
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.
Agreement between two methods of clinical measurement can be quantified using the differences between observations made using the two methods on the same subjects. The 95% limits of agreement, estimated by mean difference +/- 1.96 standard deviation of the differences, provide an interval within which 95% of differences between measurements by the two methods are expected to lie. We describe ho...
متن کاملMeasuring agreement in method comparison studies with heteroscedastic measurements.
We propose a methodology for evaluation of agreement between two methods of measuring a continuous variable whose variability changes with magnitude. This problem routinely arises in method comparison studies that are common in health-related disciplines. Assuming replicated measurements, we first model the data using a heteroscedastic mixed-effects model, wherein a suitably defined true measur...
متن کاملStatistical models for assessing agreement in method comparison studies with replicate measurements.
Method comparison studies are usually analyzed by computing limits of agreement. It is recommended that replicate measurements be taken by each method, but the resulting data are more cumbersome to analyze. We discuss the statistical model underlying the classical limits of agreement and extend it to the case with replicate measurements. As the required code to fit the models is non-trivial, we...
متن کاملA unified approach for nonparametric evaluation of agreement in method comparison studies.
We present a nonparametric methodology for evaluation of agreement between multiple methods of measurement of a continuous variable. Our approach is unified in that it can deal with any scalar measure of agreement currently available in the literature, and can incorporate repeated and unreplicated measurements, and balanced as well as unbalanced designs. Our key idea is to treat an agreement me...
متن کاملA multivariate hierarchical Bayesian approach to measuring agreement in repeated measurement method comparison studies
BACKGROUND Assessing agreement in method comparison studies depends on two fundamentally important components; validity (the between method agreement) and reproducibility (the within method agreement). The Bland-Altman limits of agreement technique is one of the favoured approaches in medical literature for assessing between method validity. However, few researchers have adopted this approach f...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
سال: 2017
ISSN: 2249-782X
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2017/23897.9314